Academic Program Planning and Review
Section: II. INST- 100
Approved By: Dr. Pamela J. Transue, 08/02/11
Last Review: 5/18/26
Last Revision: 5/18/26
Prior Revisions: Unknown
Initial Adoption: 06/15/11
Purpose
Tacoma Community College (TCC) is committed to academic excellence and continuous improvement. To support these goals, all instructional programs participate in annual Academic Program Planning and Review activities that are data-informed and aligned with the college’s strategic priorities. The purpose of this policy is to set forth expectations regarding the process of Academic Program Planning and Review. The policy demonstrates institutional commitment to data-informed planning and continuous improvement. The Academic Program Planning and Review process is an integral component of the college’s institutional effectiveness and planning process.
To Whom Does This Policy Apply
All instructional programs.
Definitions
Annual Program Review (APR): The Annual Program Review (APR) is a structured, faculty-driven, and evidence-based self-assessment of academic program performance and outcomes. It enables programs to evaluate their alignment with the college mission and strategic plan, reflect on their effectiveness, and identify areas for improvement. The APR process is collegial, data-informed, and intentionally aligned with institutional planning and continuous improvement.
Institutional Effectiveness: The college-wide commitment to using assessment and data to ensure mission fulfillment, student success, and strategic advancement.
Instructional Program: A course of study with defined learning outcomes; may be degree-bearing or non-degree-bearing.
References
Policy
Instructional programs will engage in Annual Program Review.
Procedure
The APR is written by the department / program chair in consultation with their faculty. The Office of Institutional Effectiveness will provide APR templates and relevant disaggregated data for program outcome analysis.
Annual Timeline:
- The APR is completed every fall quarter, with time set aside on Fall Assessment Day for program review of data from the previous academic year.
- The APR is submitted to the respective division Dean by December 1 of each year.
- Deans may work with Chairs for revisions until January 15.
- Deans submit final APRs to the Provost and Vice President of Academic Affairs on January 15.
- Provost and Vice President of Academic Affairs provides feedback to Deans by March 1.
- Deans share feedback with Chairs by March 15.